People who are rich are happier tan poor people

In general the discourse that spoken the people talk about the importance of the money. The society to promoting this actitude because is the essential of the actual model of development, as the principal interest is the competitiveness, and this topic have strong relations like how the people generates wealth (like consecuence of richness).

In 1949 the president harry Truman have spoken about “the underdevelopment areas in the work ... and EEUU it´s should helped to find the best road for the development”. This discursse is the base of the “modernizing of the develomnet approach”, this topic is more important than other approach for to understand the actual interest and thinking of the society. In conclution the actual model of development to promotes the accumulation, in consecuence the people who are rich are happier than poor people, because the rich people can access a goods and services more than a poor people.

This perspective say that the happiness is for how money much have me, is correct, this is a one perspective of the well, but isn´t only. Any countries the people in general loved the money, inconsequence the happiness is generated for the money. But, in Chile the money is the most important factor? This is a relevant question, the problem is we never reach an agreement.

In Chile exist other social structure, in consequence the important for happiness for the money depend, for like think the people (view of the world), not exist a general law.

In consecuence say the “people who are rich are happier than poor people” responds to only one vision of development, I Not agree or disagree with this sentences, because a think that all people have diferent interesnt, and your oppinion and ideas of develoment, is a result of other type of education because the social interesnt change with the territories. In conclution a think that not necessarily the money (or rich person) to be happy, i will can a poor person, but I´ll continue happy (depend of the interest, and the valuation of diferent aspect of the life, later his we can spoken of "poor or rich".